Home
About
Get Involved
Store
Library
Tech Support
Find Stations
Barn Raisings
Calendar
Take Action
Photo: JJ Tiziou
Home arrow FCC Comments arrow Save Our Stations From Being Taken By Big Broadcasters!!!
  • Our Issues
  • Low Power Radio
  • Media Ownership
  • Spectrum Reform
  • International
  • Full Power Radio
  • Full Power Radio
Enter the gallery
286
join us on facebook! join us on myspace!
Prometheus Calendar
See Upcoming events here
Search the Prometheus site:
Can't find it on the new site?
Look for it on the old site: oldsite.prometheusradio.org!
Translate the site:
Expand LPFM in Congress | Organizing Resources | FCC Comments | Subscribe to our Lists! | LPFM Leadership Days | .
Save Our Stations From Being Taken By Big Broadcasters!!!
Sunday, 25 November 2007

Protect your LPFM against encroachment by telling the FCC that your station should have rights, too!

Encroachment is a fancy word that means your LPFM could be threatened--and even kicked off of the air--if a full power station wants to moves its Community of License into your signal area to gain more listeners (and more advertising dollars). And now it's easier than ever for full power stations to move. Sound unfair? We think so too! And so does the FCC...at least a little bit.

In December 2007, the FCC took some promising actions on the encroachment issue that offer LPFMs recourse when a full power station moves. Some of these are in the 3rd Report & Order (translation: new rules) as temporary processing guidelines, and some are in the new Rulemaking as proposed rules. The Rulemaking asked for comment on a lot of important issues. Read the highlights of all the key questions that the FCC asked the public to comment on in the Rulemaking - thanks to our good friends Tom and Karen for preparing this document!

To get the skinny on encroachment and the FCC's recent actions on this issue, read our summary, Someone Wants Your Channel - and get ready to tell the FCC what you think they should do and about the important local service your station provides in your community. And read Who's on Second, What's on Third for our summary of the full LPFM 3rd Report and Order and 2nd Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

Tell the FCC how you feel about this! To learn what sorts of arguments are effective in an FCC comment, read What Does the FCC Really Care About? (We gave you some text to start with, we encourage you to add to it!) Email us with questions. Links to more background below)


Background Info

In 2000, when Low Power Radio was just starting, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) faced a lot of opposition from the broadcast industry. The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) were mad when (for once) the FCC sided with regular people who wanted media access instead of caving in to the agenda of the lobbyists.

The Secondary Status Trojan Horse: In order to appease the NAB, the FCC put a trojan horse into the Low Power radio rules. The FCC told the broadcasters that they were going to give out low power radio stations, but if a full power broadcaster ever felt that they wanted the channel of a LPFM, the big station could just take it. They did this on the assumption that because a big broadcaster reaches a larger audience, it ostensibly does greater public service. When a full power station moves and threatens an LPFM's signal, this is called encroachment; another way to describe it is that full power stations are primary and low power stations are secondary. It is kind of like being a second class citizen on the airwaves.

For a few years, encroachment did not happen because changing locations was complicated for full power stations. Last year, though, the FCC made the process much simpler. Suddenly, over 160 LPFM stations were threatened with losing their channels or losing parts of their coverage area. Most LPFM stations now face some level of encroachment.

Changes Are Coming: The FCC recently took some promising actions on this issue. They didn't change the primary versus secondary status, which is really what they should have done. But they made it easier for Low Power stations to find new channels to move to if they were ordered out of the way by a full power broadcaster. They also said that if there is no place for the LPFM to go to, they reject the broadcaster's attempt to move over the channel. Right now, this new policy is just a processing guideline. The FCC is now taking comments on whether to make this processing guideline into a permanent set of rules.

Your Information (Collected by the FCC and REC)
Docket to file in:
* Your Name:
* Street Address:
* City:
* State:
* ZIP Code:
E-Mail:
Comment Type


Background Links


What does the FCC really care about? - Learn what sorts of arguments are effective in an FCC comment.
Who's on second, what's on third? - Our summary of the new and proposed LPFM rules! (Thats the 3rd Report & Order and Second Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, in FCC-speak)
List of key questions in the 2nd Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - prepared by our good friends Tom and Karen!
3rd Report & Order and 2nd Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking - straight from the FCC!
Radio Controlled - A media activist's guide to the FCC.
Earlier Prometheus comments on this debate (check in particular 8/24 and 9/26 in 2005 for our most definitive treatments of this issue.)
Read About Translators
NPR Story on Encroachment
Meet a station facing encroachment
Earlier Prometheus comments on this debate (check in particular 8/24 and 9/26 in 2005 for our most definitive treatments of this issue.)
Recnetworks' excellent resources on encroachment