Home
About
Get Involved
Store
Library
Tech Support
Find Stations
Barn Raisings
Calendar
Take Action
Photo: JJ Tiziou
Home arrow Take Action arrow Expand LPFM in Congress arrow Sample Letter
  • Our Issues
  • Low Power Radio
  • Media Ownership
  • Spectrum Reform
  • International
  • Full Power Radio
  • Full Power Radio
Enter the gallery
vfclevermikeholer
Latest Events
There are no upcoming events currently scheduled.
View Full Calendar
Search the Prometheus site:
Can't find it on the new site?
Look for it on the old site: oldsite.prometheusradio.org!
Translate the site:
Expand LPFM in Congress | Organizing Resources | FCC Comments | Subscribe to our Lists!
Sample Letter
Tuesday, 07 February 2006

Sample Letter on Expanding Low Power FM

The keys to a successful letter to Congress.

Make a specific demand and do it right away.
These are busy folks. The first sentence of your letter, while cordial, should lay out the specific action you want them to take. For instance, we want to repeal the Radio Preservation Act of 2000.

 

Do your homework and offer praise when it applies.
If your Member of Congress has spoken out or voted correctly on this issue in the past, acknowledge that record, thank them, and ask them to do more. Not sure how your Senator or Congressperson voted? This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it and we'll find out for you.

Make one or two key points in support of your position and offer background.
Boil the issue down to its essence. Low-power FM has been blocked because of bogus interference claims. The Mitre Study clearly demonstrates that those claims are unfounded. Low-power FM should be reinstated to its original scope.

• Just the facts, Ma'am.
If there are a few key supportable statistics, quotes, or studies, use them to augment your argument. Avoid hot air, hyperbole, and unsubstantiated claims. There are lots of facts available on this website, and other resources we can point out to you. This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it if you are looking for a particular kind of statistic to bolster your argument as you write your letter.

• Personalize the letter to his/her district.
If you are an Low Power FM applicant, briefly tell the member of Congress how you planned to serve your community and how your plans were stymied by this legislation. If you are a current broadcaster, speak about how your station currently benefits the local culture, economy, and freedom of speech. If you hope to apply for a station, talk about how your station will make a difference in the current media system, political environment, and society of your town and region.

Do your homework, and keep in touch.
Find out who the key legislative aide is on this issue. If there is an important development, i.e. a bill is introduced -- and that may be happening soon -- don't hesitate to call or fax that aide with the latest information.

Keep your letter short.
As a general rule, keep your letter to one page. Remember, the average Congressional office receives hundreds of letters and phone calls every day on issues ranging from abortion to water projects to the war in Iraq. Keep it brief and to the point -- and they are more likely to read and listen!

Close by restating your main request, and ask for follow up.
How about a personal meeting when they are next in your home state? Call the office to follow up on the letter.

 


Sample Letter to Senators on Expanding LPFM


The Honorable _________________
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator ______________

My name is _____, and I am a representative of ________ {insert name of group here, perhaps say a bit about the aims and goals of your group, its length of time in the community, etc.}. I am writing today to urge you to repeal the Radio Preservation Act of 2000.

The Radio Broadcasting Preservation Act of 2000 was a piece of special interest legislation slipped in as a rider to an appropriations bill. In January of 2000, the Federal Communications Commission established the new Low Power FM radio service, in order to provide totally non-commercial, locally-oriented broadcast opportunities to communities across the country. The idea behind the initiative was to increase diversity on our airwaves by giving a new voice to local community organizations, churches, and non-profit groups. As a result of the FCC initiative, there are now dozens of new, legally operating low-power FM stations serving predominantly rural communities around the nation. This is an incredible success story but it is only a partial success.

In December of 2000, Congress -- under intense pressure from established broadcasters -- slipped the Radio Broadcasting Preservation Act into a 'must-pass' appropriations rider to the federal burget, gutting the original Low Power FM Radio (LPFM) service. What did the act do? Basically, the act claimed that LPFM stations would interfere with existing full-power radio stations, and that the implementation of the service should be limited. As a result of this act, almost 75% of the opportunities for new LPFM stations were destroyed. The service was established, but only in a very limited version of its original scope. Urban areas and minorities were hit hardest by the results of the Radio Broadcasting Preservation Act.

Part of the "Radio Preservation Act" mandated an independent study to see if these claims of potential were legitimate. The resulting study, conducted by the Mitre Corporation and released in July 2003, found no significant interference problems from the newly operating low-power FM stations licensed by the FCC. The Mitre Corporation even went so far as to recommend that the LPFM service be returned to its original scope! And, just this year, the FCC made its recommendation to Congress -- it is time to expand Low Power FM and bring these important radio stations to the people of the United States.

Can I count on you, as my elected representative, to fight for the expansion of community radio? Are you willing to introduce such legislation to bring Low Power to our community, or to be a co-sponsor?

Community radio is not an issue of the left or the right. The thousands of people currently enjoying and working for Low Power FM represent churches, schools, minority groups, and span the whole political spectrum. This is an issue of allowing local community groups to have their voices on their own local airwaves. Please let me know if I can count on your support in Congress.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

 

Sincerely,

 

A More Detailed Example!

The above letter provides a great introduction to the issue but what if you are a group whose application has been held up by the Radio Preservation Act? Here's how Glenn from Minnesota made expanding low-power FM a local issue.

 


Glenn's Letter to Minnesota Senator Mark Dayton

In addition to many of the points raised above, Glenn included this information in his letter to the Senate:

"...63 groups in Minnesota applied for licenses when the Minnesota filing window opened in August. of 2000. Thirty-two of these were in the Twin Cities. The Twin Cities were represented by a very diverse group of applicants including the Center for Hmong Arts and Talent, the We Win Institute, The Minnesota Literacy Council The Twin Cities Independent Media Center, the Lyndale Neighborhood Association, the American Indian Center, the Alliance of Peacemakers, and many more. After the "Radio Preservation Act", most applicants in urban areas no longer qualified for a license. Of the 32 Twin Cities applicants none no longer qualified, and statewide only eight groups were notified that they are still eligible for a license..."